Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Within the NPCC’s Digital Forensic Science Strategy 2020, the Transforming Forensics Programme identified a backlog of digital evidence examination as the first challenge that the field faces in recent years.
How many pieces of digital evidence are currently awaiting examination and how long would you estimate the backlog to be cleared?
Of the 3 core challenges outlined within this strategy (Volume of devices, Complexity of investigations and the Legitimacy of evidence) does your force consider the volume of devices for examination the most significant factor in the establishment of evidence backlog?
Alternatively do other factors such as staff shortages, labour costs and training deficits play a more significant role?
What impact has a backlog had on investigation and what measures are being taken to prevent a backlog from impacting prosecution rates?
How many cases have been dropped due to a lack of readily available digital evidence?